Process • pilot • acceptance
Implementation scenarios. Concrete assumptions and acceptance criteria.
We show model product pilots: the starting point, process change and conditions that can be tested in a real manufacturing environment.
Reference scenarios
Define a pilot without promising its result before testing.
These are not claims about completed customer implementations. They show a problem, process change and conditions that can be checked in a real environment.
Revision Manager
One part family and a controlled production package.
Before
Drawing, instruction and NC program live in different folders and must be checked manually.
After pilot configuration
Part, revision, files, approval and release form one visible flow.
Criteria to test
- the operator sees only the current package,
- the approver sees NC-program differences,
- the replaced version remains in history,
- file integrity can be checked without searching folders.
Shop Floor Time
One production cell and the complete shift timeline.
Before
Time, quantities and downtime reasons are entered after the shift or in several separate records.
After pilot configuration
The operator reports setup, production, breaks, downtime, good quantity and scrap in one terminal.
Criteria to test
- every event retains person, machine and operation context,
- event order creates a readable timeline,
- queued entries after connection loss are not duplicated,
- a manager filters data without manually merging sheets.
Actual criteria, test data and acceptance ownership are agreed for the specific plant. The scenarios are not savings forecasts or guarantees.
Your process
Turn a general presentation into an acceptance scenario.
Describe the current flow and where an error, delay or missing information occurs. We will start with a scope that can actually be tested.